Berlin - Timo Grönke - An exit is not yet a reappraisal.

One thing first: people can change and we generally welcome it when people leave the neo-Nazi scene permanently. Of course, it plays a role how old the people were when they joined the scene, how long they were there and what tasks they took on. We are expressly NOT interested in saying: “Once a Nazi, always a Nazi.” But a serious exit means more than distancing yourself from former comrades. Leaving means ensuring a permanent break with the scene and coming to terms with why extreme right-wing worldviews were found to be politically appealing. This is a lot more complex than simply telling a new story about yourself.

In the case of Timo Grönke, from our point of view, there is a significant reduction in his own actions in the past, which means that he avoids a deeper examination of his guilt. Instead, processing is outsourced to social work services, such as the rightly criticized “Violence Prevention Network” or police departments. Overall, the impression is that Grönke's main reason for coming to terms with his membership in the neo-Nazi scene was primarily pressure from outside. Repression is followed by a “deradicalization program” and exchanges with repressive organs. His stories give the impression that he is no longer a Nazi because he was no longer able to pursue his hobby as a referee due to anti-fascist pressure and the other neo-Nazis were not particularly nice to him. To justify his years of commitment, Grönke is now publicly spreading the well-known story of the young follower who actually only came into the scene through his search for recognition. However, this narrative leaves essential aspects of his activities at the time unmentioned. There is no ideological reappraisal and a comprehensive distancing from the content.

From the anti-fascist publications about Timo Grönke it quickly becomes clear that he was by no means just an inconspicuous actor on the fringe who - as he claims - only came into the sights of the investigating authorities because he had carried fireworks in his pocket on the instructions of group leader Julian Milz. During his time as a young neo-Nazi, Grönke was one of the most active actors in the “Deutsche Jugend Voran” network in Berlin. He didn't just go along quietly, but tried independently to politicize and mobilize people to the right.

For some time, Grönke presented himself at demonstrations as a kind of journalist/influencer and worked as a photographer whose photos served an extreme right-wing self-portrayal. He also ran - albeit not very successfully - a right-wing internet project called “DEaktuell”. There he already claimed to be politically neutral, but at the same time spread right-wing content and uncritically showed people such as his former comrade Julian Milz. His representations were already quite contradictory back then: While on the one hand he strategically criticized Julian Milz's violence after his raid on his Instagram account, on the other hand he supported public relations work for his comrades with his internet project. Overall, his appearance painted a quite erratic picture. Grönke initially supported the neo-Nazi demonstrations that Ferhat Sentürk organized in Berlin, but shortly afterwards he railed against them with the words "Screw the Tü****demo".
Timo Grönke was therefore not simply an amplifier of the views of DJV and the like. He independently spread right-wing content. For example, at the beginning of 2025 he independently posted calls to disrupt an anti-fascist protest on February 22nd in Berlin-Hohenschönhausen against an AfD rally. On that day, Grönke again attended the meeting in blue party clothing. However, his connections to the AfD have not played a role in the disputes so far. Overall, the contributions on his homepage and his postings on other channels did not sound like fear of the DJV's management level. Rather, it appeared that he himself sought to assume a strong public role. Even during his time as a neo-Nazi, Timo Grönke was a proven political self-promoter. He also supported the neo-Nazi scene on the streets. In 2024 and 2025 he could be found at many neo-Nazi marches nationwide, including in Berlin, Chemnitz and Dresden. He was repeatedly noticed by his extremely aggressive demeanor.

This aggressiveness, his threatening behavior towards journalists and anti-fascists and his strong presence in the scene (on the street and on social media) are inevitably part of a confrontation with his past. The repeated public use of neo-Nazi codes such as “SS” and the number “88” are also part of this image. All these incidents happened just 1-2 years ago. We do not deny that he no longer wants anything to do with his former neo-Nazi comrades. We also believe that he has to live with threats and insults due to his public departure from the neo-Nazi scene. But we wonder why his own past is treated so selectively in his exit narrative. It is also noticeable that he only publicly discloses facts that have already been proven by anti-fascist research. Other knowledge that he would have acquired during his time with “Deutsche Jugend Voran” (such as meeting places, names of supporters, concrete planning of acts of violence) does not appear in his accounts. It seems questionable that a key player in the young neo-Nazi scene doesn't know more about it than anti-fascist research groups. For a credible break with the scene, a comprehensive presentation of knowledge to self-organized structures (and not just the cops) would be necessary in order to really block any way back and underline the seriousness of one's own desire to leave.  

Instead, we are currently experiencing how Timo Grönke is once again demanding attention with an exit that is thin in terms of content but has been heavily addressed publicly and this is being granted to him uncritically. This ranges from numerous recent interviews with various media outlets to invitations from YouTubers in various formats. For example, Erik Peter from Taz expresses Grönke's wish to be able to take part in Prides and other demonstrations in the future. The aim here is clearly to build pressure on the organizers; true to the motto "The reformed dropout doesn't want to scare anyone!" Overall, the image of Timo Grönke as a political self-promoter is confirmed for us. Why is his story, which does not go beyond anti-fascist research, given so much public space? And why are the perspectives and experiences of those who were affected by the violence of the neo-Nazi group, who were aggressively harassed, outed and threatened by Grönke, hardly heard? It seems that Timo Grönke's exit is primarily about himself and that his strategy remains acceptable to bourgeois media - especially those with a left-wing slant.

We are aware that our criticism may be met with contradiction. Timo Grönke is now a member of the Green Party in Marzahn-Hellersdorf. Previously, he wanted to organize himself into anti-fascist structures in May 2026 and presented himself on Instagram wearing a “Hammer and Sickle” shirt. In the meantime, Grönke has built up numerous personal networks outside the neo-Nazi scene in which people experience him as likeable and open-hearted. Based on these experiences, it is said that he publicly positions himself against the right and therefore experiences hostility from the neo-Nazi scene. Nevertheless, compassion is no substitute for political reappraisal. And membership in the Greens is not evidence of a completed ideological reappraisal process. Especially not when it comes to people like Grönke, who went from neo-Nazi to “communist” to Green Party member within a year. Rather, this frequent change in political identity raises further questions and is certainly not a deep examination of one's own political past or personality.

Our aim is not to deny Timo Grönke any political changes. Our concern is what standards should be applied to such a change process so that it is comprehensive and credible. We also have to ask why Grönke in particular is given this public stage. An exit can be a start. But it is not a clean bill of health or a ticket to new political contexts. Dropouts should do one thing first and foremost: show remorse, work through their own guilt and listen to those affected. Timo Grönke became an influencer instead. What he failed to achieve in the right-wing scene, he is now achieving with the help of numerous platforms that happily give him reach with his half-baked stories. 

We should take a closer look at who is offered a platform here and, above all, which perspectives remain invisible.

Pictures: web address: http://www...License of article and all embedded media: Creative Commons by-sa: Share Alike